I don't think you understand what the word "overrepresentation" means.
If Jews are barely a few percentage points of the population, and yet vastly overrepresented in the levels of those who push this in media, academia, finance, etc., then there is an issue to point out.
Nobody is saying only Jews do this, or every single person who pushes for this is Jewish.
The point is that Jews are vastly overrepresented and have huge influence.
That includes Alan Shatter in Ireland, Barbara Lerner Specter in Sweden, Ervin Cohn in Norway. Who is funding what they do? Who sanctions this and approves it at every level of society, especially in media and the arts? Who pushes punishment for those who want to criticize it?
This isn't just a few individuals operating due to personal sentiment. These are enormously influential institutions, including the EJC, WJC, IsraAid, Soros Open Society, etc.
This is while Israeli politicians openly say they want to clean out Gaza and send the Palestinians to Ireland or Spain or Norway as punishment, because that is what they are. The same thing happened during the 2003 Iraq War and the 2015 migrant invasion, and it persists today.
It's just so obvious and can be so easily noticed by even the dumbest people that running interference like this simply won't work. It's become way too blatant for people like you to try to deflect.
I mean, you can try, but it simply isn't going to work.
Over-representation does not equate to collective responsibility or that others are not also responsible.
Jews are not over-represented in any major way in power institutions in Spain, Iceland, Italy, etc and yet we see the SAME problems there pushed by liberal Whites.
> That includes Alan Shatter in Ireland, Barbara Lerner Specter in Sweden, Ervin Cohn in Norway.
Yeah I can find 100 liberal White Gentiles to match them pushing the same shit. Peter Sutherland (leading immigration advocate rant he UN migration service, Irish Catholic), Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, Joe Biden, Bono, Tony Blair, Frans Timmermans, Elizabeth Warren, etc. The Sanctuary Movement in the US was started by Christians: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctuary_movement
And what? You're simply cherry-picking liberal Jews and ignoring liberal Christians, liberal White Gentiles, liberal Blacks, etc. who have the same positions.
> These are enormously influential institutions, including the EJC, WJC, IsraAid, Soros Open Society, etc.
And there far more Christian equivalents like Catholic Charities, US Conference of Catholic Bishops, Lutheran Immigration Services, World Relief, etc. In all Euro countries Christian churches are leading refugee resettlement. 6 of the top 10 refugee charities in the US with the most government funding are Christian. 90% of refugee charities in the UK are Christian. The German Protestant Church funds sea-watch boats to pick up migrants. The Vatican, Church of England, etc. all support that. You IGNORE it because you're obsessed with one group.
The difference is Jews are a foreign presence with hostile intentions, and that is manifested in their overrepresentation in subversive activity. There are centuries of this to back up what I say--there's a reason the 109 times meme exists.
Jews run institutions that affect all of Europe, not to mention the United States, where it's even worse.
That's why we see what we see today.
It's too late to run interference now. Everyone sees it, and this won't work.
I hope telling lies for this is worth it though! We'll see if the goyim fall for it and get tricked into invading Iran, even though it's very obvious.
You're pushing a fraudulent worldview that all and only Jews are liberals and only they influence policy. That's provably false, especially in countries like Spain, Iceland, etc. where they have a minimal prescence, and even in countries where they have significant influence like the US, where 6 of 10 top refugee agencies are Christian.
There are also Jews on the opposite side of liberal issues like Eric Zemmour, Stephen Miller, Laura Loomer, Michael Levin, etc. who oppose the great replacement and fight it tooth and nail.
Ashkenazi Jews are also Caucasians who look White and have lived in Europe for thousands of years and adopted Euro cultures, so they are just another off-shoot of Caucasoid.
Liberal Whites are just as active in "subversive activity" yet you won't hold them accountable because you're a biased WN feminist whackjob pushing a "White liberals dindu nuffin" fake narrative.
I agree. This is why it's so bizarre The West’s “leaders” just gave up. Traitors, quislings and villains have always been a part of the story, The West has lost THE WILL to survive.
> doesn't mean that the vast majority of Icelandic people want more foreign invaders
That wasn't a claim I made, but what it does show is that there are thousands of people in Iceland who want more refugees and all the major political parties, as I demonstrated, want more as well.
So in Iceland's case, blaming "Jews" is a total red herring even if they are prominent in other countries promoting that. White liberals are also prominent in all these countries promoting more immigration and refugees, as well as the churches, as I have demonstrated elsewhere.
If Icelandic people keep voting in left-wing liberal parties who open the borders and push feminism and all the rest, then that's on the Icelandic people and nobody else.
Your comment is one vast jumble of self-contradictory nonsense.
White liberals aren't behind the foreign invasion of Europe. It's Jewish political power and funding disproportionately, and they're scrambling to get control over parties like the AfD in order to keep them in line to support Zionist politics.
Icelandic people do not want an invasion, and crying about feminism won't save you. Icelandic politicians are trying to stop it as we speak, even while Jewish power players are trying to start yet another war in the Middle East to lead to what--more "refugees"? To where?
This is not on the Icelandic people. They're just like every other group of citizens in other European countries--they don't want to be invaded.
This isn't going to work. I think even you know that.
Some do and some of their leftist politicians do as well.
> crying about feminism won't save you
Oh so you're a feminist running cover for Icelandic feminists, makes sense why you want to harp about "JQ" as well because you're loathe to admit the role of feminist women in Western downfall.
You're a typical biased WN who thinks that White people are innocent victims of "others" and would never take on liberal positions if not for "others" making them do it. This is a totally false worldview.
You're essentially INFANTILIZING Whites and acting like they're stupid morons with no brains of their own. White liberals have agency and their own motives to support this stuff. You're an apologist for leftists because you are a leftist (feminist).
Here comes the DARVO--"you're infantilizing whites by holding Jewish activists responsible for their subversion!" This should work, almost as good as calling Hitler woke lol. Where do you idiots get these talking points? I think I might know.
The Icelandic people in their vast majority do not want to be invaded by angry Muslims who got invaded by the US military acting on Zionist orders. That's why this "asylum" scam is getting shut down.
Trying to run cover for this won't work.
Women are more against foreign migrants, including in France, and this going to blow up in your face. Crying about feminism instead of holding George Soros accountable is going to make people laugh.
Btw, the word "loathe" is a verb meaning to dislike greatly. You meant to use the word "loath," which is an adjective meaning reluctant. It's a basic mistake, and stop making it if you want to be a writer of some kind. This is my pet peeve.
No, I hold Jewish and White liberals accountable, you only want to hold J liberals accountable while EXCUSING the White and Christian liberals. You're a fraud.
Oh so now you're playing grammar nazi because you've been refuted.
The Icelandic government is one of the most libtarded in the world (feminist, LGBT, pro-trans, etc.), led entirely by Icelandic people. Ditto in Sweden, Italy, Austria, Ireland, etc. The Spanish government is led entirely by Spanish people and it's the most left-wing liberal, feminist, pro-gay open borders government in the West right now. And they support Palestine so there goes your "Jews control them" fake cop-out.
You're simply an apologist for White liberals because you're a dishonest charlatan.
Yes, grammar and spelling matter to me because I think they’re important. You made that mistake in one of your articles too. Go fix it.
I never said shabbos goys never went along with it. But the origin is still Jewish activism.
The UK government was lead by the conservative government for basically 14 years. Immigration exploded during that time, even after voters expressed repeatedly they wanted immigration to decrease.
Stop repeating yourself, and stop crying about liberals and feminism.
This isn’t going to work, and I think you know it.
Barbara Specter is a nutjob Jewish liberal but she showed up in Sweden in 2005. Multiculturalism was WELL underway in Sweden LONG before that and it was spearheaded by Swedish politicians like Olof Palme. Spectre got funding from the SWEDISH government to run her group as well.
"the adoption of an official multicultural policy relied crucially on Olof Palme and his ideas in his role as an 'activist gatekeeper"
Palme was a standard leftist who disliked Israel, so there's no pathetic cop-out that "Jews" controlled him:
"He wasn't a supporter of Israel, and he was critical of the Israeli government's actions, particularly after the Six-Day War and the invasion of Lebanon. "
"Prime Minister Olof Palme compared Israel's treatment of Palestinian children to Nazi Germany"
Funny that you're perfectly comfortable holding whites to collective responsibility, but you cry about doing the same to blatantly obvious Jewish activism.
You're a "national conservative," eh? What are you conserving? For what nation?
Brandon, it's just too obvious. You should just go play video games.
I don't hold Whites collectively responsible, I said "White liberals" not "Whites".
I hold liberals responsible, White, Jewish, Christian, Black or whatever. I don't deny "Jewish activism" either, I simply say it's part of the milieu of liberal activism alongside Christian liberal activism, which YOU deny because you're dishonest.
You're an apologist for White liberals because you're a White feminist trying to shift blame off feminist women for supporting all this shit.
Nobody wants more refugees. Some people like the idea, but no human actually likes the experience of being surrounded by strangers.
Yes, it was confirmed fake. More interesting is how a guy who looks like a drowned rat married a cutie.
So have Christians: https://www.martinezpolitix.net/p/christian-support-for-mass-immigration
Should we blanketly condemn all Christians for that?
I don't think you understand what the word "overrepresentation" means.
If Jews are barely a few percentage points of the population, and yet vastly overrepresented in the levels of those who push this in media, academia, finance, etc., then there is an issue to point out.
Nobody is saying only Jews do this, or every single person who pushes for this is Jewish.
The point is that Jews are vastly overrepresented and have huge influence.
That includes Alan Shatter in Ireland, Barbara Lerner Specter in Sweden, Ervin Cohn in Norway. Who is funding what they do? Who sanctions this and approves it at every level of society, especially in media and the arts? Who pushes punishment for those who want to criticize it?
This isn't just a few individuals operating due to personal sentiment. These are enormously influential institutions, including the EJC, WJC, IsraAid, Soros Open Society, etc.
This is while Israeli politicians openly say they want to clean out Gaza and send the Palestinians to Ireland or Spain or Norway as punishment, because that is what they are. The same thing happened during the 2003 Iraq War and the 2015 migrant invasion, and it persists today.
It's just so obvious and can be so easily noticed by even the dumbest people that running interference like this simply won't work. It's become way too blatant for people like you to try to deflect.
I mean, you can try, but it simply isn't going to work.
https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41568997.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/20/george-soros-to-invest-500-million-in-help-for-refugees-through-his-open-society-foundations.html
Over-representation does not equate to collective responsibility or that others are not also responsible.
Jews are not over-represented in any major way in power institutions in Spain, Iceland, Italy, etc and yet we see the SAME problems there pushed by liberal Whites.
> That includes Alan Shatter in Ireland, Barbara Lerner Specter in Sweden, Ervin Cohn in Norway.
Yeah I can find 100 liberal White Gentiles to match them pushing the same shit. Peter Sutherland (leading immigration advocate rant he UN migration service, Irish Catholic), Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, Joe Biden, Bono, Tony Blair, Frans Timmermans, Elizabeth Warren, etc. The Sanctuary Movement in the US was started by Christians: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctuary_movement
And what? You're simply cherry-picking liberal Jews and ignoring liberal Christians, liberal White Gentiles, liberal Blacks, etc. who have the same positions.
> These are enormously influential institutions, including the EJC, WJC, IsraAid, Soros Open Society, etc.
And there far more Christian equivalents like Catholic Charities, US Conference of Catholic Bishops, Lutheran Immigration Services, World Relief, etc. In all Euro countries Christian churches are leading refugee resettlement. 6 of the top 10 refugee charities in the US with the most government funding are Christian. 90% of refugee charities in the UK are Christian. The German Protestant Church funds sea-watch boats to pick up migrants. The Vatican, Church of England, etc. all support that. You IGNORE it because you're obsessed with one group.
It's all here in my article: https://www.martinezpolitix.net/p/christian-support-for-mass-immigration
The difference is Jews are a foreign presence with hostile intentions, and that is manifested in their overrepresentation in subversive activity. There are centuries of this to back up what I say--there's a reason the 109 times meme exists.
Jews run institutions that affect all of Europe, not to mention the United States, where it's even worse.
That's why we see what we see today.
It's too late to run interference now. Everyone sees it, and this won't work.
I hope telling lies for this is worth it though! We'll see if the goyim fall for it and get tricked into invading Iran, even though it's very obvious.
Good luck in life.
https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/wjc-brussels-conference-tackles-jewish-community-security-post-7-october
"Welcome the Stranger, unity in diversity" - US Conference of catholic Bishops
https://www.usccb.org/committees/pastoral-care-migrants-refugees-travelers/welcoming-stranger-among-us-unity-diversity
"Quaker Meetings Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Enforcement in Houses of Worship"
https://democracyforward.org/work/sensitive-locations-immigration/
"US Catholic bishops sue Trump administration for halt in funding for refugee settlement"
https://apnews.com/article/catholic-bishops-lawsuit-refugee-resettlement-trump-administration-09477d766651a940ae53840ce3bd9c6e
"More Than 500 Evangelical Leaders Sign Letter Decrying Trump's Refugee Ban"
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/more-than-500-evangelical-leaders-sign-letter-decrying-trumps-refugee-ban_n_589b5c9ae4b04061313adf83
"Christian groups oppose Trump’s preference for Christian refugees"
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-immigration-christians-234341
"100 evangelical leaders sign ad denouncing Trump’s refugee ban"
https://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/08/politics/evangelicals-ad-trump
You are simply a pathetic apologist for White and Christian liberals.
You're pushing a fraudulent worldview that all and only Jews are liberals and only they influence policy. That's provably false, especially in countries like Spain, Iceland, etc. where they have a minimal prescence, and even in countries where they have significant influence like the US, where 6 of 10 top refugee agencies are Christian.
There are also Jews on the opposite side of liberal issues like Eric Zemmour, Stephen Miller, Laura Loomer, Michael Levin, etc. who oppose the great replacement and fight it tooth and nail.
Ashkenazi Jews are also Caucasians who look White and have lived in Europe for thousands of years and adopted Euro cultures, so they are just another off-shoot of Caucasoid.
Liberal Whites are just as active in "subversive activity" yet you won't hold them accountable because you're a biased WN feminist whackjob pushing a "White liberals dindu nuffin" fake narrative.
Yes
I agree. This is why it's so bizarre The West’s “leaders” just gave up. Traitors, quislings and villains have always been a part of the story, The West has lost THE WILL to survive.
> doesn't mean that the vast majority of Icelandic people want more foreign invaders
That wasn't a claim I made, but what it does show is that there are thousands of people in Iceland who want more refugees and all the major political parties, as I demonstrated, want more as well.
So in Iceland's case, blaming "Jews" is a total red herring even if they are prominent in other countries promoting that. White liberals are also prominent in all these countries promoting more immigration and refugees, as well as the churches, as I have demonstrated elsewhere.
If Icelandic people keep voting in left-wing liberal parties who open the borders and push feminism and all the rest, then that's on the Icelandic people and nobody else.
Iceland is one of the most liberal countries in the world: https://www.martinezpolitix.net/p/icelands-liberal-polices
Your comment is one vast jumble of self-contradictory nonsense.
White liberals aren't behind the foreign invasion of Europe. It's Jewish political power and funding disproportionately, and they're scrambling to get control over parties like the AfD in order to keep them in line to support Zionist politics.
Icelandic people do not want an invasion, and crying about feminism won't save you. Icelandic politicians are trying to stop it as we speak, even while Jewish power players are trying to start yet another war in the Middle East to lead to what--more "refugees"? To where?
This is not on the Icelandic people. They're just like every other group of citizens in other European countries--they don't want to be invaded.
This isn't going to work. I think even you know that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G45WthPTo24
> Icelandic people do not want an invasion
Some do and some of their leftist politicians do as well.
> crying about feminism won't save you
Oh so you're a feminist running cover for Icelandic feminists, makes sense why you want to harp about "JQ" as well because you're loathe to admit the role of feminist women in Western downfall.
You're a typical biased WN who thinks that White people are innocent victims of "others" and would never take on liberal positions if not for "others" making them do it. This is a totally false worldview.
You're essentially INFANTILIZING Whites and acting like they're stupid morons with no brains of their own. White liberals have agency and their own motives to support this stuff. You're an apologist for leftists because you are a leftist (feminist).
Here comes the DARVO--"you're infantilizing whites by holding Jewish activists responsible for their subversion!" This should work, almost as good as calling Hitler woke lol. Where do you idiots get these talking points? I think I might know.
The Icelandic people in their vast majority do not want to be invaded by angry Muslims who got invaded by the US military acting on Zionist orders. That's why this "asylum" scam is getting shut down.
Trying to run cover for this won't work.
Women are more against foreign migrants, including in France, and this going to blow up in your face. Crying about feminism instead of holding George Soros accountable is going to make people laugh.
Btw, the word "loathe" is a verb meaning to dislike greatly. You meant to use the word "loath," which is an adjective meaning reluctant. It's a basic mistake, and stop making it if you want to be a writer of some kind. This is my pet peeve.
You should just go play video games.
https://www.politico.eu/article/france-eu-elections-2024-women-vote-far-right-policy-emmanuel-macron-july-7/
https://www.icelandreview.com/news/iceland-sees-spike-in-deportations-amid-policy-shift/
No, I hold Jewish and White liberals accountable, you only want to hold J liberals accountable while EXCUSING the White and Christian liberals. You're a fraud.
Oh so now you're playing grammar nazi because you've been refuted.
The Icelandic government is one of the most libtarded in the world (feminist, LGBT, pro-trans, etc.), led entirely by Icelandic people. Ditto in Sweden, Italy, Austria, Ireland, etc. The Spanish government is led entirely by Spanish people and it's the most left-wing liberal, feminist, pro-gay open borders government in the West right now. And they support Palestine so there goes your "Jews control them" fake cop-out.
You're simply an apologist for White liberals because you're a dishonest charlatan.
Yes, grammar and spelling matter to me because I think they’re important. You made that mistake in one of your articles too. Go fix it.
I never said shabbos goys never went along with it. But the origin is still Jewish activism.
The UK government was lead by the conservative government for basically 14 years. Immigration exploded during that time, even after voters expressed repeatedly they wanted immigration to decrease.
Stop repeating yourself, and stop crying about liberals and feminism.
This isn’t going to work, and I think you know it.
Barbara Specter is a nutjob Jewish liberal but she showed up in Sweden in 2005. Multiculturalism was WELL underway in Sweden LONG before that and it was spearheaded by Swedish politicians like Olof Palme. Spectre got funding from the SWEDISH government to run her group as well.
"the adoption of an official multicultural policy relied crucially on Olof Palme and his ideas in his role as an 'activist gatekeeper"
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10286632.2017.1335719#:~:text=It%20shows%20that%20the%20adoption,Cultural%20Policy%20passed%20in%201974.
"Palme tried to make Sweden attractive to immigrants through assimilation policies in favor of multiculturalism."
https://en.unav.edu/web/global-affairs/detalle/-/blogs/puertas-del-valhalla-la-politica-migratoria-sueca
Palme was a standard leftist who disliked Israel, so there's no pathetic cop-out that "Jews" controlled him:
"He wasn't a supporter of Israel, and he was critical of the Israeli government's actions, particularly after the Six-Day War and the invasion of Lebanon. "
"Prime Minister Olof Palme compared Israel's treatment of Palestinian children to Nazi Germany"
https://www.change.org/p/ban-israel-from-eurovision-song-contest-2025/u/32383599
You're simply an apologist for White liberals".
LOL okay
Funny that you're perfectly comfortable holding whites to collective responsibility, but you cry about doing the same to blatantly obvious Jewish activism.
You're a "national conservative," eh? What are you conserving? For what nation?
Brandon, it's just too obvious. You should just go play video games.
I don't hold Whites collectively responsible, I said "White liberals" not "Whites".
I hold liberals responsible, White, Jewish, Christian, Black or whatever. I don't deny "Jewish activism" either, I simply say it's part of the milieu of liberal activism alongside Christian liberal activism, which YOU deny because you're dishonest.
You're an apologist for White liberals because you're a White feminist trying to shift blame off feminist women for supporting all this shit.