Who Instigated the Second World War?

Social media grifters are trying to confuse the topic with disinformation

Answer: Hitler.

There’s a ton of pseudo-historical bullshit floating around social media these days because autistic forms of contrarianism are fed by the algorithms and grifters play into it for clout and money.

Like this nonsense.

Winston Churchill was not even the Prime Minister of the UK when Hitler invaded Poland and WW2 kicked off, yet here is Jake Shields saying a guy who had no political power at the time started the war.

Shields is one of these meme IQ social media pundits who routinely amplifies disinformation and slop takes that he picked up from garbage like Europa Last Battle. And the sheep who follow people like him eat it up because they’re too lazy to fact check anything.

Then there’s the types who trot out the asinine claim that the war started in 1933 when private Jewish groups launched an economic boycott of Germany, which had virtually no effect and quickly fizzled out.

There was no physical war at this time and this boycott didn’t work. So how was this the start of the war? Just another pathetic attempt to shift the blame off Hitler.

Despite this weak private boycott, Germany continued apace tearing up the Treaty of Versailles, the German-Anglo Naval Agreement and began rapidly rearming, all the while Britain led by Chamberlain appeased her with the Munich Agreement in 1938. Hitler claimed Sudetenland was his last territorial demand in Europe, then he quickly broke his promise by occupying the rest of the Czech lands.

Hitler’s path to imperialism was one of incrementalism: first Rhineland, then Sudetenland, then Austria, then Czechia… then he invaded Western Poland, later Russia, etc. If he had done all of that in one fell swoop it would not have worked, so he slowly took a piece here and there, and then declared Total War in his mad dash for Lebensraum in the East. No serious historian, not even the dubious pro-Hitler David Irving, disputes that Lebensraum was Hitler’s primary motivation for occupying Poland and the USSR.

In a February 1939 meeting, Volker Ullrich quotes Hitler stating his intention to rearm Germany to full capacity and implement universal conscription with the aim of “conquest of new living space in the east and its ruthless Germanification.”

In a May 23 1939 speech to his army chiefs, Hitler stated his intention to invade Poland for reasons of Lebensraum:

In three secret speeches of January and February 1939, Hitler laid out “the blood racial basis of the Nazi weltanschauung, the economic reasons obliging Germany to push further into central Europe, and the inevitability of war.”

In an August 1939 meeting, Hitler makes it clear he wanted no negotiations with Poland and that he prefers war:

I am only afraid that at the last moment some Schweinhund might put to me a plan for mediation! – Adolf Hitler

All throughout Mein Kampf Hitler declares his intention to establish a German empire “by the sword!” He calls it a CRUSADE to the East to win bread.

He calls for establishing a “unified expanse” connecting all Germans into a giant empire in Europe so that Germany can become a “world power”. He says colonial acquisitions outside of Europe won’t do the trick. It must be inside Europe.

Over and over again Hitler says Germany needs MORE space, that the 1914 borders were “anything but logical,” a “political absurdity” not worth fighting for, and that Germany must crusade further East to win NEW space in “Russia and its borderlands”.

Post that next time a memetard trots out the slop that all Hitler wanted was to restore the 1914 borders, the exact opposite of his written words.

Here Hitler says that he supported England's occupation of India on the basis that Indians are racially inferior and then says Germany must take that same outlook towards Russia.

He identifies Russia and its borderlands as the space he wants to colonize.

In his last letter to general Keitel, Hitler reiterates the war aim of Operation Barbarossa to “win territory in the East for the German people.”

In a 1943 meeting with his generals, Hitler says the war aim is to conquer new living space and establish Germany as a hegemonic power in Europe, a theme repeated through Mein Kampf.

Excerpts from Goebbels’ diaries prove that the German leadership on the cusp of Barbaross viewed the Russians as WEAK and vulnerable to German attack, demonstrating that the war was far from “pre-emptive” (the traditional pro-Nazi cope), but a premeditated act of aggression in the planning for some time.

Hitler tried to justify this aggression by declaring Russians, Poles and Slavs in general “racially inferior” despite not being a separate race from Germans, but genetically very similar.

Other top Nazis repeated these tropes against Slavs to rubberstamp their colonial policy in the East.

Both Hitler and Goebbels began referring to Slavs as “animals” to dehumanize them during the war while Himmler said they were only good for digging ditches for Germans.

Slavic tribes had mixed into German bloodlines centuries ago and Hitler himself admitted in MK that Germans are not a pure ethnicity and have admixtures from Eastern Europe.

Here Hitler admits that. Then he says that even among Germans the "Nordic" ones are better and that Germans mixing with other Europeans historically “robbed us of world domination.” If they had stayed a pure ethnicity they would be a “mistress of the globe.”

The fact that grifters, memers and assorted liars are trying to spin Hitler as a pacificist, hippy, animal-loving, vegan peacenik are beyond absurd attempts at rewriting history and whitewashing Hiterlism so they can rehabilitate it and begin recruiting for it once again.

But Hitlerism is NOT pro-White, it is not pan-European, it’s a pure expression of Germanic imperialism and chauvinism that caused the greatest bloodbath in European history. Resurrecting this larp by lying about its actions and intentions to sell it to non-German Whites is deceit and must be opposed if we want to build a truly pro-White, pan-European movement that puts old European feuds, rivalries and disputes behind us for a United Europe against globalism and leftism. Nazism will only drag us back to the bloody past of inter-European infighting and strife.

---

If you enjoyed this piece, consider a contribution or membership.