Tom Sewell Explains Why He Wants Racist Communism & a White Version of Affirmative Action

NS = Racial Marxism

CommuNazism

Check this clip:

In it is Tom Sewell, an Australian National Socialist evangelist, explaining why he wants a communist centrally planned economy: he thinks Jews will outcompete White Gentiles in the markets.

So he wants the government to do some kind of affirmative action program to favor his particular in-group (Anglo-Celtics) because they supposedly can't compete with Jews without interventions. This sounds identical to BLM rhetoric demanding a race-based socialism so that black outcomes can improve vs Whites who outcompete them.

This self-refutes his own assertion that "Aryans" are superior to Jews. If they lose to Jews in competition, then they’re not superior. Big ideological fail here! The Führer would be disappointed.

Then he says the only difference between what he wants and Communism is that Communism is "Jews doing central planning, whereas our system is Aryans doing central planning".

So no difference!!!

(Also not always true, plenty of non-Jews ran communist governments too.)

Note the standard NS schizophrenia where he says Jews want free market economies, then says they're behind Communism (the inverse of free markets). Which is it? It can't be both. If it's both then they're in conflict with each other, debunking the monolith meme. Another big fail!

"The difference between communism and the Hitler faith is very slight" - Goebbels

There are some valid reasons to be weary of too much Jewish influence, especially in government or in the form of political lobbies that represent foreign powers like Israel. I'm not going to say otherwise. Western countries should not just be political prostitutes for Israel or perceived Jewish interests. They have their own destinies to pursue. I have said and will continue to say that Western Jews must choose where their loyalties lie: the Western country they inhabit or Israel, and commit to one. I’d like to see more Eric Zemmours and less Jonathan Pollards. This “dual loyalty” issue is not unique to Jews, as you can see people of other ethno-religious backgrounds engaged in spying for foreign nations like Russians, Chinese, Arabs, etc., but it has become somewhat of an issue since the creation of Israel in 1948.

However, this bit about "we need central planning and communism because we lose to these clever Jews who are good at business" is just a pathetic WN version of affirmative action. It's a flip of "White privilege" to "Jewish privilege" and "White Gentiles need to be upgraded via intervention because we can't compete with Jews in the job markets". This is inter-caucasoid grievance Olympics. Ashkenazis are White, so he's really going at them for not being "Anglo-Celtic," the specific ethnicity he wants.

I bet if Mediterranean or Slavic Australians were as successful as Jews economically, he’d also see that as as a threat to “Anglo-Celtic” dominance and call for similar affirmative action/redistribution policies to shift their money back towards Anglos. Once again, defeating the “Anglos are superior” assertion if you can’t compete with other groups naturally and need a government hand to prop you up. AngloNiggaz4Life G-Unit!

This is what Hitler did too. It was affirmative action for German Gentiles vs German Jews who he saw as tough competition for jobs and prestige that he wanted exclusively for non-Jew Germans. It was stretched because German Gentiles still had the lion's share of power and top spots despite Jewish over-representation.

Of 11 top officials running the German government in 1930, 0 were Jewish.

"Jew naming" is thus the WN version of BLM's "White privilege". Jews (and all other minorities) do have more legal protections than White Gentiles under the gay civil rights laws because of their status as a fake religious minority; that part is true and should be rescinded. But whining about being outcompeted by Jews in job markets strikes me as aggrieved nibba talk equivalent to what many underachieving blacks say about Whites.

NS is thus a magnet for lower-class Whites looking for a status bump. It's a collection of blue collar physical laborer types who view Jews negatively because they're mostly White collar nerds who work in finance, law, academia, medicine, journalism, etc. Hitler took up the same line, pegging them as “merchants, traders, etc.” and not partaking in the physical labor that he glorified. But many, if not most, White Gentiles today work in such non-physical fields and do those types of jobs, so this lower-class envy will also extend to White Gentiles who don't do manual labor. These manual labor supremacy types believe that only working with one’s hands is “real work” and anything using your mind is “fake work”. Well, architects aren’t the ones banging in the nails, so I guess that’s also a “fake job”. Teachers aren’t laying bricks, so I guess that’s “fake work” too. Computer programmers aren’t using a hammer to code, so more fake work, eh?

This is a recipe for class warfare and will end up in a Whites-only version of Cuba where the lowest-IQ and least qualified Whites will be given privileged positions to lead society despite being incompetent.

I think you can be pro-White and oppose multiculturalism/mass immigration without adopting a BLM-style grievance/victim ideology that centers lower-class status. Grievance victim sperging is only attractive to the slags of society, hence why movements like BLM and their wignat equivalents (NSM, NSN, National Action, Atomwaffen, etc.) are riddled with criminals, sexual deviants and perennial fuck-ups.

Sewell recruits nasty criminals directly out of jails and prison gangs into his organization.

Criminal scum gleefully join up because they have nothing to lose and he promises them “gibs infinity” (interest-free loans, free houses, free cars, a “job for life” at inflated wages, etc.) with his White Racial Communism platform. An attractive offer for life-long deadbeats in and out of jail who can’t hold down a decent job.

Historical and modern NS was and remains a frenzied pander to the lower-classes, the maladjusted, the screw-ups. Hitler proudly proclaimed himself a poverty-stricken “have-not,” which drove his envy towards the rich “haves”.

Despite the hollow self-improvement rhetoric, the bulk of NS discourse centers around seething about having low-status in comparison with Jews and “White traitors,” their nickname for upper-class (or even middle class) Whites who don’t support their goals.

This is the purest form of Racial Marxism: we are owed stuff simply for being poor and White. A message like this can only truly resonate with fuck-ups and dregs with an entitlement issue. The same types of scoundrels who joined up with BLM demanding gibs infinity after the Floyd death.

A genuine “pro-White” ideology should not just preach victim narratives and socialist entitlement demands, but real self-improvement and motivation to do better instead of blubbering on about others who have done better. In my view, an “in-group preference” ought not bleed into gratuitous self-pity and a poverty cult.

Can White Aussies Really Not Compete With Jews? Let’s Look at Some Numbers

The idea that White Aussies can’t compete with Jews, who are 0.46% of the population, economically or in any other way is pretty loony.

Grok says White Aussies are 77% of the population.

If 77% can’t compete with 0.46% (19 million vs 117,000), then the “Aryan superiority” claim falls flat. But White Aussies are doing just fine.

One study showed that people born in English-speaking countries consistently fared much better economically than those born outside of English-speaking countries:

“Of adults born in a major English-speaking country, 27% were in the highest 20%. Of those born in other countries, 26% were in the lowest 20%.”

Grok puts Australians of “English-speaking ancestry” as the highest per capita incomes, then Chinese, Indian, Filipino and Indigenous at the bottom.

Grok says Australian Jews’ median personal income was $59,800 which is significantly above the average of $41,860.

Per capita considerations has it at $44,900 and Hebrew-speaking Australians, which are probably Israeli immigrants, are making $50,076, which is also above the average.

So if we take that first figure, Jewish Australians are indeed outperforming all other groups economically, but $59,800 a year hardly makes one rich.

The fact is that Jews are too tiny a group to get in the way of White Aussies getting jobs. 117,000 people simply can’t be a roadblock for 19,000,000. This is a list of the richest 50 Australians:

Of these 50, 32 are Anglo/Irish/Scots descent (that’s 64%) and 8 are Jewish (that’s 16%) and the others are also mostly White (German, Greek, Croatian, Italian, etc.)

So as usual Jews punch above their weight, but Anglos are still the dominant economic group. Drop down to multi-millionaires and upper-middle class (those earning in the 100s of thousands per year) and most likely packed with Anglos too.

Let’s look at the Australian central bank.

Governance Board

Monetary Policy Board

Of these 15 unique individuals, 12 are mostly Anglos and three are Jews.

So Anglos have the lion’s share of spots at this institution.

This is the current Australian government:

Grok breaks it down as mostly Anglo-Irish-Scottish with some Eastern Europeans and only one Jew.

Here’s the heads of the security agencies, all Anglos:

Here’s the Aussie Supreme Court, all Anglos, maybe one Jew:

Here’s the top 10 Aussie corporations and their CEOs:

Eight of 10 are Anglo/Irish Aussies.

Of the major news companies and newspapers, three CEOs are Anglo-Australians and one Italian-Australian.

I could go on.

Clearly, Anglo-Australians still have a dominant share of wealth and power in Australia. So what is Sewell and his gang going on about in terms of Muh Jews? He is using the success of Jews economically, which does not negate the success of Whites economically, to justify a White racial version of Marxism, but none of that is required to deal with whatever issues may arise from Jewish influence.

The biggest potential issue is the capture of foreign policy by Israel-First types, which can be scuttled with a blanket ban on foreign lobbies and dual-citizens serving in the government. Only Australian citizens with no foreign ties or potential allegiances should get government posts. Easy.

The rest of what Sewell pushes on this economic theme is just classic low-class resentment of the wealthy, which absolutely will include wealthy Anglo/Celtic Aussies, even if he’s doing the “it’s only Jews” fake bit right now for propaganda purposes. Once in power, he will turn his guns on not only the super-wealthy but also the upper-middle class Australians, confiscate their wealth and redistribute it to his favored cronies in the lower-classes.

I’m not saying everyone in the lower classes is “bad” per se, but what I am saying is that they’re not inherently “good” either. Just because you’re poor or bang nails into drywall doesn’t make you virtuous. There is more criminality among the lower classes than the middle and upper. Nothing wrong with laboring, farming, plumbing, carpentry and other physical work. The trades are great and needed, but that doesn’t mean that someone who works in a bank, or in an office writing code, or in a school teaching maths is not also a “worker” contributing to society.

---

If you enjoyed this article please share and consider a small contribution.